NB CEER Survey

Le cadre de mise en œuvre de l'énergie communautaire

Le sondage sur l'état de préparation à la mise en œuvre d'énergie dans les communautés prendra entre 5 et 10 minutes. En répondant au sondage, vous aurez accès aux stratégies recommandées à prendre en compte pour la mise en œuvre de votre PEC.

Instructions d'enquête

Lisez les facteurs de mise en œuvre suivants et indiquez dans quelle mesure vous êtes d’accord ou pas avec les facteurs sur une échelle de 1 à 5.

Résultats du sondage

Merci d'avoir rempli le sondage sur l'état de préparation à la mise en œuvre d'énergie communautaire.

Une liste de stratégies recommandées vous a été envoyée par courrier électronique. Vos réponses et recommandations sont répertoriées ci-dessous.

Passer au cadre communautaire de mise en œuvre de l'énergie

Implementation Survey - NB CEER Implementation

Vos informations

Avant de commencer l’enquête, parlez-nous un peu de vous.

Prénom

Nom de famille

Organisation

Ville

Province

Adresse électronique *

Votre adresse électronique ne sera utilisée que dans le but de vous envoyer une liste personnalisée de recommandations basée sur les réponses à votre sondage. Vous ne recevrez aucun autre email GTI et ne serez pas placé sur une liste de diffusion à moins que vous ne cochiez la case ci-dessous.

Cases à cocher

S'il vous plaît ajoutez-moi à votre liste de diffusion.

End Section

Section

How many years has your community had a community energy plan for? *

If your community does not have a CEP, answer N/A

In terms of the implementation the community energy plan, what has been the most challenging aspect facing your community?

If your community does not have a CEP, answer in terms of implementing projects in general

If your community energy plan is a part of the Federation of Canadian Municipality's Partners for Climate Protection program, which milestone is your community currently at?

Do you feel you are a part of a network of collaboration with other communities?

How youy ever used the "Getting to Implementation" tool? If so, how long ago?

How many people are regularly involved in working with the CEP?

How many full time equivalents staff persons are spent on the implementing the CEP?

What resources have you found to be the most helpful while implementing the CEP?

If no plan in place, answer N/A

What resources, not currently available to you, do you think would be the most helpful while implementing the CEP?

Do you personally feel as though you are making good progress towards your goals in the CEP?

If no plan, choose N/A

Do you feel your goals are obtainable in content as well as time frame?

If no plan, answer N/A

Section Buttons

The Plan

Factor 1: The CEP vision and benefits are clear and able to inspire local leaders, local government staff and community stakeholders to act. *

Factor 2: The number, diversity and interdependence of actions in the CEP is manageable. *

Factor 3: The CEP energy and greenhouse gas emission targets, and actions, are specific, measureable, attainable, relevant and time-bound. *

Factor 4: There is clear understanding among those leading the CEP about the risks associated with not implementing the CEP. *

End Section

Contexte communautaire

Factor 5: Council is supportive of a more integrated approach to planning energy within the community and there is a sentiment among Council that implementing the CEP can help achieve other community priorities (e.g. economic, health, social) *

Factor 6: The local government is perceived by stakeholders to have the legitimacy and capacity to lead the development and implementation of a CEP. *

Factor 7: Provincial/territorial policies, programs and regulations are supportive of local efforts to develop and implement CEPs. *

Factor 8: The local government is leading by example and has implemented community energy projects and programs that are recognized as successful by the community. *

Factor 9: There has been strong uptake from local residents and businesses of existing programs focused on energy conservation (including transportation, energy efficiency, waste, etc.). *

Factor 10: The administrative structure of our organization supports, rather than acts as a barrier to, CEP implementation. *

End Section

Management and Governance

Factor 11: There is a dedicated staff person responsible for leading implementation, delegating responsibilities to other local government staff and monitoring implementation activities among external stakeholders. *

Factor 12: Local government department staff know which aspects of the CEP impact or are impacted by their work and there is an assigned staff person responsible for implementing, measuring and reporting on the actions in the plan. *

Factor 13: Those responsible for implementation have a process in place to convene and communicate regularly. *

Factor 14: There is a leadership team in place, with representation from council, local government and key community stakeholders, to provide strategic direction on the CEP. *

Factor 15: There is an implementation team in place and the team has the authority and mechanisms to implement the plan, and can make changes to the implementation plan based on new learning, shifts in context, and implementation challenges. *

Factor 16: In cases where the implementation team does not have authority to implement actions, new governance models have been developed to support implementation. *

Factor 17: There is a clear decision making framework in place to support CEP implementation. *

End Section

Staff and Financial Resources

Factor 18: Local government staff tasked with implementation have sufficient skills, commitment and time to manage the implementation of the plan and/or have ability to improve their capacity as required. *

Text

Factor 19: Risk of staff turnover is low and there is a succession plan in place to pass on the corporate knowledge of the plan. *

Text

Factor 20: There is funding to support a dedicated staff person to oversee CEP implementation. *

Section Buttons

Section

Factor 21: There is sufficient internal funding in place to support capital expenses, programs and contractors. *

Section Buttons

Factor 22: There is sufficient external funding in place (e.g. funding from energy distributors, provincial/territorial funding, real estate developers, etc.) to support capital expenses, programs and contractors. *

Text

Factor 23: There is clear understanding among those leading CEP implementation about what can reasonably be implemented and in what time frame, based on local government staff and financial resources. *

Engagement des parties prenantes

Factor 24: There is a process in place to engage stakeholders on an ongoing basis. *

Factor 25: There is clear understanding about how CEP implementation is generating/will generate value for community stakeholders. *

Factor 26: Community stakeholders contributed to the development of the plan and feel ownership for its key actions, responsibility for its implementation, and commitment toward hoped for results. *

Factor 27: There is a clear understanding about what actions community stakeholders have committed to implementing, and stakeholders have indicated that resources are or will be in place to support implementation in an agreed to timeframe. *

End Section

View Framework

If you are human, leave this field blank.

Copyright © QUEST – Quality Urban Energy Systems of Tomorrow, 2016. These materials may be reproduced in whole or in part without charge or written permission, provided that appropriate source acknowledgements are made and that no changes are made to the contents. All other rights are reserved. The analyses/views in these materials are those of QUEST, and these analyses/views do not necessarily reflect those of QUEST’s affiliates (including supporters, funders, members, and other participants). QUEST’s affiliates do not endorse or guarantee any parts or aspects of these materials, and QUEST’s affiliates are not liable (either directly or indirectly) for any issues that may be related to these materials.

This survey has been adapted from the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory. Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001). Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory. St. Paul, MN: Wilder Research.

Lisez les facteurs de mise en œuvre suivants et indiquez dans quelle mesure vous êtes d’accord ou pas avec les facteurs sur une échelle de 1 à 5.

Il y a 27 facteurs. Le sondage prendra entre 5 et 10 minutes.

Merci d'avoir rempli le sondage sur l'état de préparation à la mise en œuvre d'énergie communautaire.

Une liste de stratégies recommandées vous a été envoyée par courrier électronique. Vos réponses et recommandations sont répertoriées ci-dessous.

Vos informations

Section

The Plan

Contexte communautaire

Management and Governance

Staff and Financial Resources

Section

Engagement des parties prenantes